Tamron 35-105 1:2.8

[Monk]

I'm the new guy so i thought would post a test i did yesterday.. I'm a studio owner and I've been digital for only a year now.. still learning this image was rendered about an F11..Trying a test without the filter I normally use..a tiffen F/X3

[Swampy]

Welcome Monk. The image appears a little soft on my side. Was this the full frame resized or is this a full sized crop? Great lighting though!

[Igor]

I'd add the picture crop is great too!
How do you like this lens?

And Welcome! :)

[Monk]

Thanks for the reply guys. I just cropped a certain area of the image. I've been digital for a year now and I've grown tired of the other forums where I don't learn much on the tech end. I ran across this site and thought I would give it a try. Igor.. I love this lens. great quality and it does the job. Swampy.. I use soft lighting in studio, a 27x57 softbox for my main and a 4'x6' softbox for my fill and a lightpanel for another fill. I hope to learn alot here.. thanks guys!
Monk

[deMille]

Monk,

Great shot. Took me a second to realize he was holding a filter. Excellent.

Dale

[Linda G]

Excellent shot. I am surprised his fingers look soft at f11, though. And as a pro digital retoucher, I want desparately to clean his finger. <g>

[VA_Shooter]

I think it's entirely possible that the boy moved his hand a bit as the shutter was open. At F11 in soft, low light, the shutter's not going to clip off at 1/500, eh? Still a beautiful shot, nice light, beautiful eyes on the child. Nice work, Monk.

[killians913]

Ah, Linda...that's what I like about you...you have an eye for detail!!

Lockett

[Monk]

Thanks for the feedback everyone.. I'm glad to see nice people and i hope I can fit in here with everyone.. I'll post more of my work as time permits.